Look at this. They get full benefits and are paid around $40k/y to work about a thousand hours a year. That means that, in terms of effort that goes in versus money that goes out, they are paid about like a decent programmer on average. If my experience was at all typical, most of them do a terrible job and don't even try to do a good one. Throw into that that there is a mechanism specifically designed to ensure they don't have to do a good job (tenure), and it's a pretty sweet deal.
I would say being paid comparably to one of the most highly paid professions in our country while not being held to any real standard of quality and, in fact, being explicitly shielded from any such standards puts teachers in the category of "overpaid" rather than "underpaid." If a government wants to cut costs by bringing their pay into alignment with the value they deliver (or at least improving the alignment), then so be it. Don't like it? Find a different job.
Most of the people who should be teaching children probably aren't in it for the money anyway.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
we need to let the market control what teachers are paid/benes. if the price is too low, we wont have enough, and we would then know to raise prices. Right now, it's just the usual human greed of having something good and wanting more.
ReplyDeleteSteve: Yes. Totally.
ReplyDeleteIt'd be interesting to see how you arrived at the 1000 hours a year number. I have a lot of teachers in my family tree, and they seem to work a lot more than me most months.
ReplyDeleteThey probably work more like 1200 a year. I figured nine days every two weeks with three months off, six hours a day. There are a few here and there that use the time they are given as it was intended: preparing lessons, grading papers, etc. My experience taught me that most just treat it like paid time off and so that's what it ends up being.
ReplyDelete